MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566159997

Сорта сои, рекомендуемые для использования в селекции по программе импортозамещения

2016· article· ru· W2566159997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. I. Nekrasov

Bibliographic record

VenueМасличные культуры. Научно-технический бюллетень Всероссийского научно-исследовательского института масличных культур · 2016
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarYield (engineering)BiologyPoint of deliveryChinaAgronomyHorticultureAnimal scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of the work was to investigate and save of the soybean genetic potential to identify donors and sources of valuable breeding traits. The study of samples in the fields of the branch of the Kuban experimental station of VIR was conducted from 2008 to 2015 in accordance with the methodological guidelines of VIR. The cultivar Komsomolka (VNIIMK) was used as a standard. Traits of the standard cultivar had the following average meanings: yield was 313.7 g per m2, seed yield per plant -39.9 g, 1000 seeds weight 169 g, the average height of the lowest pod attachment 10 cm. there were studied 349 new soybean samples. The main valuable economic and breeding traits are studied. Some collection soybean samples are very interested for breeders: on early maturity i-611486 (Sweden) with the vegetation period 85 days; on high seed yield per plant i-614237 (Switzerland), i-614235 (France), i-614244 (Canada), i-0144391 (Russia); on yield -i-0144391 (Russia), i-614076 Lara (Serbia); on 1000 seeds weight i-606924 (Canada); i-606933 (China) (1000 seed weight was 337 and 234 g, respectively). Samples i-606951, i-606942, i-606933 (China) are distinguished by the height of the lowest pod attachment 26; 23 and 20 cm, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueМасличные культуры. Научно-технический бюллетень Всероссийского научно-исследовательского института масличных культурSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207