MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566222603

"The Brains of a Nation": The Eugenicist Roots of Canada's Mental Health Field and the Building of a White Non-Disabled Nation

2016· article· en· W2566222603 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edward H. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthWhite (mutation)ImmigrationMental hygienePolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)MythologyGender studiesHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyHistoryLawArtPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the literature published by the Canadian National Committee for Mental Hygiene (CNCMH), a precursor to the Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), from 1918-1921, and its connection to eugenicist social policies. Specifically, this study involves a critical discourse analysis of the Canadian Journal of Mental Hygiene (CJMH) published by the CNCMH, which illustrates how the roots of Canada's mental health field are linked to a nation-building project deeply intertwined with eugenicist notions of race and disability. Foundation myths that reinforce the Canadian nation were also imbued in the literature, including: Canadian identity as linked to white non-disability, Canada as tabula rasa, and eugenicist fears of the ‘over-population’ of ‘undesirables’. On the basis of these foundation myths, the CNCMH considered mental hygiene discourse and practice as a means to further Canada as a white nondisabled nation. The desire to further the Canadian nation in this manner led to the promotion of eugenicist social policies. Many of these policies - especially, immigration controls - were put into place by the Canadian government and remain to this day. “ Les cerveaux d'une nation”: Les racines eugeniques du domaine de la sante mentale et  la construction d'une nation blanche et non-handicapee. Resume Cet article examine des documents publies entre 1918-1921 par le comite national d’hygiene mentale du Canada (CNHMC), organisation precurseur de l'association canadienne pour la sante mentale (ACSM). Il examine surtout sa connexion avec des politiques sociales eugeniques.  L’article deploie une analyse critique du Canadian Journal of Mental Hygiene (CJMH), publie par le CNHMC, qui demontre que les origines du domaine de la sante mentale au Canada est liee au projet de nation canadienne, lui-meme profondement entrelacees de notions eugeniques de race et de handicap. Des mythes fondateurs qui reifient la nation canadienne  impregnent egalement ces documents: l'identite canadienne definie comme blanche et non-handicapee, le Canada existant en tant que tabula rasa, et les craintes que la  surpopulation des « indesirables » nous menace. Se reposant sur ces mythes, le CNHMC considerait que les discours et les pratiques sur l'hygiene mentale etaient des moyens de promouvoir une nation canadienne blanche et non-handicapee. Promouvoir une telle nation canadienne a mene a soutenir des politiques sociales eugeniques. Plusieurs de ces politiques- surtout sur l'immigration et le controle policier- ont ete mise en place par le gouvernement canadien alors, et demeure en place aujourd'hui. Mots clefs : hygiene mentale; identite national canadienne; racisme; immigration; eugenisme

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207