MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566281077 · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042119

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>88</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>single-ion optical clock with a stability approaching the quantum projection noise limit

2015· article· lv· W2566281077 on OpenAlexaff
P. Dubé, A.A. Madej, Andrew D. Shiner, Bin Jian

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMetastabilityStability (learning theory)Ground stateAlgorithmIonStatisticsAtomic physicsMachine learningQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of optical frequency standards have been evaluated with fractional uncertainties between ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}17}$ and ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$. Reduction of the statistical uncertainty of a clock comparison to this level is challenging, requiring the best possible stability to avoid excessively long averaging times. We report recent improvements of our $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}{}^{+}$ single-ion standard that have reduced its 1-s Allan deviation from $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}14}$ to $3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}$, yielding an order of magnitude decrease in averaging time for a given statistical uncertainty level. Among the improvements made are the implementation of a clear-out laser that transfers the ion from the metastable state to the ground state at each cycle, followed by a state preparation step that transfers the ion to the ground-state magnetic sublevel of the probed transition. With these changes, the ion clock transition interacts with the probe laser at every interrogation cycle. The stability of our optical standard is essentially limited by the quantum projection noise for pulse lengths up to $\ensuremath{\approx}100$ ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4200.351

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207