MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A2-14: Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of model and patient acute myeloid leukemias

2015· article· en· W2566445060 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Barabé, Magalie Celton, Audrey Forest, Anne Bergeron, Radia Marie Johnson, Laurine Gil, Angélique Bellemare‐Pelletier, Sonia Cellot, Josée Hébert, Étienne Gagnon, Brian T. Wilhelm

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyeloid leukemiaEpigeneticsLeukemiaContext (archaeology)Fusion geneCancer researchDNA methylationChromosomal translocationBiologyMyeloidCD34GeneImmunologyGeneticsGene expressionStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Next generation DNA sequencing has provided significant insights into the genetic determinants of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Large scale sequencing studies of AML patient cohorts have revealed a remarkable level of genetic heterogeneity between patients who nevertheless have the same disease phenotype. As a solution to the problem of extensive genetic diversity between patients, we have modified a previously published model system in order to generate multiple human leukemias from CD34+ cord blood cells from a single healthy donor. A human MLL-AF9 (MA9) fusion gene is retrovirally introduced into the donor cells which are then cultured for 30 days before being transplanted into immunocompromised (NSG) mice that subsequently develop either AML or acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after ~24 weeks. We have now generated 22 leukemias from 4 single donors and have performed RNA-seq on the samples during their step-wise leukemic transformation (i.e. CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells with MA9, and the resulting leukemias). We have compared these data to RNA-seq data we have generated for several pediatric AML patients with MA9 translocations, as well as normal blood cells and other tissues. This analysis has revealed 39 candidate genes with an expression pattern highly specific for MA9 AMLs. Interestingly, we can find no evidence for secondary mutations acquired by the human leukemias in our model system, suggesting the human MA9 translocation is sufficient to generate leukemias in this context. To understand the epigenetic impact of the MA9 fusion gene, we have examined the DNA methylation changes at each stage in our model system using a capture survey approach (e.g. Human Methyl-Seq; Agilent) and used this same approach for several primary patient samples with MLL translocations. These data have been correlated with gene expression changes within the model system and have revealed a number of specific changes with relevance for the process of transformation. Lastly, functional assessment of specific candidate genes through shRNA knock-down experiments has shown that at least some of these candidate genes, which are known oncogenes in other tumor types, are essential for MA9 AML. In summary, the combination of RNA-seq data from patient and single donor model AMLs has highlighted consistent genetic changes associated with this AML sub-group, and has also revealed novel potential therapeutic targets. Citation Format: Frederic Barabe, Magalie Celton, Audrey Forest, Anne Bergeron, Radia Johnson, Laurine Gil, Angélique Bellemare-Pelletier, Sonia Cellot, Josee Hebert, Etienne Gagnon, Brian T. Wilhelm. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of model and patient acute myeloid leukemias. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A2-14.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→