Robust stability of uncertain Markovian jump neural networks with mode-dependent time-varying delays and nonlinear perturbations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the problem of delay-dependent stability is investigated for uncertain Markovian jump neural networks with leakage delay, two additive time-varying delay components, and nonlinear perturbations. The Markovian jumping parameters in the connection weight matrices and two additive time-varying delay components are assumed to be different in the system model, and the Markovian jumping parameters in each of the two additive time-varying delay components are also different. The relationship between the time-varying delays and their upper delay bounds is efficiently utilized to study the suggested system in two cases: with known or unknown parameters, which leads to more information of the lower and upper bounds of the time-varying delays that can be used. By constructing a newly augmented Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and using the extended Wirtinger inequality and a reciprocally convex method, several sufficient criteria are derived to guarantee the stability of the proposed model. Numerical examples and their simulations are given to show the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".