MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566628598 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.335.335

Results of a Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial of Thalidomide and Prednisone Maintenance Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

2004· article· en· W2566628598 on OpenAlexaff
A. Keith Stewart, Christine Chen, Kang Howson‐Jan, Darrell White, Jean Roy, Michael J. Kovacs, Chaim Shustik, Anna Sadura, Shepherd Lois, Keyue Ding, Ralph M. Meyer, Andrew R. Belch

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine ProgramOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchMcGill UniversityHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreNova Scotia Cancer CentreLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalidomideMedicineTolerabilityPrednisoneMultiple myelomaClinical endpointMelphalanMaintenance therapySurgeryInternal medicineSingle CenterRandomized controlled trialAdverse effectChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) patients benefit from high dose chemotherapy, however relapse is inevitable and novel means of maintaining remission are required. Although oral thalidomide is an attractive agent for maintenance studies no careful dose finding studies have been performed in this setting. Given uncertainties about the long-term tolerability and the appropriate therapeutically active dose of thalidomide in this situation, we completed a prospective multi-center, randomized phase II trial to assess the tolerability of combined thalidomide and prednisone maintenance in MM and to select a preferred dose of thalidomide to eventually test in the phase III setting. Enrolment was from July 2000 to September 2001. Eligibility required administration of melphalan 200mg/m2 with blood stem cell support within one year of treatment onset and initiation of maintenance within 60–100 days post stem cell infusion. All patients received prednisone 50mg p.o. on alternate days and thalidomide at a starting dose of 200mg escalating to a target dose of either 200mg or 400mg p.o. daily. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dropout or dose reduction due to treatment toxicity within 6 months. Because of an excess of treatment - related toxicity, entry to the 400 mg dose arm was closed after completing the first stage of the projected sample size. Sixty Seven patients were enrolled. Median follow-up is 36.8 months. The primary endpoint was reached by 31% of patients on the thalidomide 200mg arm and 64% of patients on the thalidomide 400mg arm. Allowing for dose reduction, 76% of patients assigned to thalidomide 200mg and 41% of patients assigned to thalidomide 400mg remained on any maintenance therapy 18 months after registration. The median cumulative dose of thalidomide received is 83.5g (range 16–1626g) on the 200mg arm, while it is 76.9g (range 66–3520g) on the thalidomide 400mg arm. Thus, patients on the higher thalidomide starting dose cumulatively received less drug overall as a consequence of toxicity. Eighty eight percent of all patients dose reduced thalidomide and 72% of all patients dose reduced prednisone within 2 years of beginning maintenance. Using EBMT response criteria 15% of patients at study entry had attained a complete or near complete remission post-transplantation. During follow up, the best response achieved was upgraded in 53% of evaluable patients with 38% assessed as achieving a complete or near complete remission one year after study entry. Median time from start of therapy to registration was 9.9 months. Progression free survival from time of registration post transplant was 32.3 months (42.2 months PFS from beginning of therapy). Seventeen of the 67 patients have died by August 2004; one year survival was 91%.Only the thalidomide 200mg arm of this trial met our definition of a tolerable maintenance therapy defined as no dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity in at least 65% of patients for a minimum of 6 months. A randomized Phase III trial is now testing this maintenance regimen versus placebo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207