MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566672770 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-5355

Abstract 5355: Oncolytic viral therapy with immune modulation is an effective novel treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer

2015· article· en· W2566672770 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Liu, Jason Spurrel, Zhong Qiao Shi, Wenqian Chen, Don Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerOncolytic virusCancer researchImmune systemTumor microenvironmentMedicineCancerImmunologyCytotoxic T cellImmunotherapyLewis lung carcinomaCombination therapyBiologyOncologyPharmacologyInternal medicineMetastasisIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 85% of these diagnoses and despite incremental improvements with cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapeutics, the five-year overall survival is only 17%. Recently improved understanding of immune checkpoint pathways and immunosuppresive cellular populations such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have led to a resurgence in immunotherapeutic strategies. Reovirus (RV) is an oncolytic virus that only targets cancer cells with certain aberrant signaling pathways such as Ras while avoiding normal cells. Furthermore, its role in stimulating an anti-tumor immune response has been recently described. Additionally, Sunitinib (S), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (anti-VEGFR, C-Kit and PDGFRa) also affects tumor microenvironment Tregs and MDSC numerically, which could consequentially augment RV immunotherapeutic potential. Hypothesis: RV and S combination therapy is an effective treatment modality for NSCLC via direct oncolysis, tumor immunosuppression reversal, and host anti-tumor immune response stimulation. Methods: To determine the relative susceptibility of selected NSCLC cell lines to RV, S and combination therapy, a WST-1 cell viability assay was conducted. Four human NSCLC cell lines A549, H460, H1299, and H1975 and the mouse Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell line LL2 were tested, and the combination index (CI) was calculated using Calcusyn software to determine in vitro synergy. The LLC syngeneic C57BL/6 immunocompetent mouse model bearing LL2 cells in the right hind-flank was treated with PBS, S, RV, UV-inactivated RV (DV), or combination therapies (N = 6 mice/group). Mice were sacrificed on day 27. Spleens, blood, and tumors were harvested for analysis. Splenocytes were subject to flow cytometry CD11b and Gr-1 detection for MDSC quantification. Splenocyte CD8+ enrichment was performed, co-cultured with LL2, RV, DV, S or combinations and subject to IFN-γ quantification via ELISA to determine immune recognition. Results: Treatment resulted in efficacy and synergy of RV/S in A549, H460, and H1299 in vitro as indicated by CI values < 1. LL2 showed additive to synergistic responses at varying treatment concentrations. When LLC tumors in a C57BL/6 immunocompetent murine model were treated with the combination of RV/S, a significant tumor reduction occurred compared to monotherapies and untreated controls (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals). Furthermore, an increase in anti-tumor immunity stimulating IFN-γ was detected in mice samples upon RV and combination exposure at 0.13μg/mL and 0.09μg/mL compared to PBS treated mice at 0μg/mL. Both S and RV/S treated mice had a significant splenocyte MDSC reduction. These results indicate that Reovirus and Sunitinib combination therapy holds promise as a novel treatment strategy for NSCLC. Citation Format: Jianrui Liu, Jason Spurrel, Zhong Qiao Shi, WenQian Chen, Don G. Morris. Oncolytic viral therapy with immune modulation is an effective novel treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5355. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5355

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207