MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566682669 · doi:10.21673/anadoluklin.180675

Türk Tıp Tarihinde “Anadolu Kliniği” (1933-1954) / “Anatolian Clinic” in the History of Turkish Medicine (1933-1954)

2016· article· tr· W2566682669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi · 2016
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOttoman and Turkish Studies
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurkishMedicineAncient historyHistoryGeneral surgeryClassicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We would like to present one of the most noteworthy medical periodicals, “Anadolu Kliniği”, published in Turkey. Started to be published in 1933 in Konya, Anadolu Kliniği (Anatolian Clinic) was edited by Dr. Ahmet İhsan, Dr. Asil Mukbil Atakam and Dr. Şerif Korkut. On its early periods the board of publishing was composed of Turkish physicians, then starting from 1935 foreign physicians were integrated to the editorial group. The periodical was ceased two times, in 1942 and in 1949. It can be assumed that the first break in 1942 was due to World War II’s distressing atmosphere and the second break in 1949 was probably due to economic reasons. The periodical was published till 1954. In this work, there can be found all the names of articles published in Anadolu Kliniği within 20 years with a bibliographic analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it