Bibliographic record
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is an excerpt of this article: In L.M. Montgomery’s Anne of Ingleside, readers encounter the beloved heroine of Anne of Green Gables, Anne Shirley, now Anne Blythe, as a middle-aged wife and mother of six. As she contemplates her role as matron, she thinks, “she would hold all the threads of the Ingleside life in her hands again to weave into a tapestry of beauty” (55). Anne’s ability to weave the threads of life, to create a beautiful tapestry of connected human experience from the lives of the individuals surrounding her, serves as proof of her domestic artistry. Even as a young girl, in Montgomery’s classic canonical children’s novel Anne of Green Gables, Anne Shirley weaves her life tapestry through the power of imagination. Earlier considerations of Anne of Green Gables and Anne as artist-figure have focused on her imaginative skills and her talents as a self-conscious dramatic artist and writer, and scholars such as Gillian Thomas, Nancy Huse, and T.D. MacLulich have noted the “decline” of Anne’s artistry as she matures throughout the series. I contend, however, that if readers examine Anne’s role as a domestic artist who weaves the social fabric of the Avonlea community through her ability to imagine, appreciate, and create beauty, they encounter a self-fashioned heroine who yearns for membership in family and community while remaining “other-interested” or, in this case, invested in artistic creation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".