MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567001250 · doi:10.1109/camad.2016.7790339

Detection of M-ary OFDM systems with CPM mapper over multipath channels

2016· article· en· W2567001250 on OpenAlexaff
Emammer Shafter, Raveendra K. Rao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdditive white Gaussian noiseOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMultipath propagationComputer scienceAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Continuous phase modulationModulation (music)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a class of OFDM systems with Continuous Phase Modulation (CPM) mapper signals is discussed and theoretical predictions for symbol error probabilities are derived, where the memory is employed to improve system performance. Previously, results summarized that binary data of OFDM systems with CPM mapper is mapped with complex symbols using the concept of correlated phase states of CPM signal. The results presented in this paper show that M-ary OFDM systems with CPM mapper outperforms the conventionally used M-ary memory-less mapper in OFDM systems. Optimum and suboptimum multiple-symbol observation OFDM systems with CPM mapper receivers are derived. Multipath channel with Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) is assumed. Also, symbol error rate performance in terms of high and low SNR bounds is analyzed and assessed in terms of the value of the deviation ratio h, time delay, and attenuation level. This paper provides a complete analysis of the performance of the OFDM systems with CPM mapper at high SNR as well as low SNR and as a result unifies and extends the previously available results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207