MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567074648 · doi:10.1093/fs/knw320

S <scp>cévole de</scp> S <scp>ainte-</scp> M <scp>arthe</scp> , <i>Œuvres complètes</i> , <scp>iv</scp> : <i> Paedotrophiae libri <scp>iii</scp> </i> ; <i>Publications des années 1580–1587</i> ; <i>Poemata 1587</i> ; <i>Publications des années 1588–1592</i> . Édition chronologique avec introduction, notes et variantes par J <scp>ean</scp> B <scp>runel</scp> Sainte-MartheScévole de, <i>Œuvres complètes</i> , <scp>iv</scp> : <i> Paedotrophiae libri <scp>iii</scp> </i> ; <i>Publications des années 1580–1587</i> ; <i>Poemata 1587</i> ; <i>Publications des années 1588–1592</i> . Édition chronologique avec introduction, notes et variantes par BrunelJean. (Textes littéraires français, 634.) Genève: Droz, 2015. 848 pp., ill.

2016· article· fr· W2567074648 on OpenAlexaff
John Nassichuk

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryLiteratureArtClassicsHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although recent decades have seen a healthy increase in research on neo-Latin authors of sixteenth-century France, poets of that period’s latter half remain relatively neglected in comparison with the Humanists of the early Valois court. Jean Brunel’s edition of the works of Scévole de Sainte-Marthe, the first volume of which appeared with Droz in 2010, now happily constitutes a major contribution to the field. This fourth instalment contains the three-book Latin poem entitled Paedotrophia, which, as Brunel notes in his Introduction, the author himself probably regarded as his magnum opus. It also contains several other works from the decade between 1582 and 1592. In the interests of space, the present review will consider the Paedotrophia as a representative sampling of the volume’s entirety. The Paedotrophia is preceded by a thirty-three-page Introduction, which reconstructs with admirable clarity the genesis of this didactic poem on childbirth and the education of children, first establishing the probable date of an early (1579) partial edition attested today in just two known copies. Such a task is rendered all the more difficult by the fact that the definitive edition of Sainte-Marthe’s poetic masterpiece appeared only some five years later, in a 1584 print dedicated to Henri III, which adds a new third book to the initial fragment. Of the original text, the second book in particular was for Sainte-Marthe the object of much significant rewriting, so that its first two versions diverge considerably. Instead of publishing the 1579 version of the Paedotrophia in its original, unfinished form, Brunel has adopted the strategy of presenting the poem’s three books together, ‘comme si l’ouvrage avait déjà été achevé en 1579’ (p. 44). The result is a three-book epic containing several interpolations from the 1584 text, as well as a critical apparatus indicating variants and omissions. The parallel French translation combines the fragments rendered by the author himself and those later provided by his grandson, Abel (II) de Sainte-Marthe, as well as several passages culled from even later editions, here translated by the editor. Despite the complexity of this undertaking, Brunel succeeds in providing modern French readers with an accessible text and translation of one of sixteenth-century France’s most important Latin poems. He also provides an annotation, with references to contemporary sources; exhaustivity is of course impossible in this format. The volume’s second part contains Sainte-Marthe’s publications from 1582 to 1587, including several occasional poems such as those that appear in the Christophori Thuani Tumulus, the Tombeau de Monsieur Rouxel, and the Tombeau de Pierre de Ronsard. In the volume’s third and final section, Brunel presents the reader with Sainte-Marthe’s monumental 1587 Poemata, with a lengthy Introduction. Seiziémistes (and especially the neo-Latinists among them) may now read the major poetic works of Scévole de Sainte-Marthe in Brunel’s excellent modern edition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2230.155

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207