Using the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Treatment Approach with Adults with Stroke: Efficacy and Adaptations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis reports on a multi-phased research project conducted to evaluate the use of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach with adults with stroke. Current approaches to motor recovery, called systems approaches, suggest that movement arises from a dynamic interaction among several different systems, including perception, cognition, and action, all within the context of the individual and his or her environment. CO-OP is an established treatment approach for children with motor-based performance problems that takes into account interactions among several systems, as well as individual needs and environmental factors. CO-OP is a client-centred, problem solving approach based on the theoretical foundations of learning and motor learning theory. The objectives of this project were: to examine the efficacy of CO-OP to improve motor skill acquisition and performance in adults living with chronic stroke; to explore other benefits of the approach; and to identify adaptations for use with adults with stroke. Two series of single case experimental studies were conducted, with three participants completing each. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Findings from the single case experiments provide evidence that CO-OP is associated with performance improvements in both trained and untrained self-selected goals in adults more than one year post stroke. As well, pre-post measures suggest there may be changes in performance satisfaction, motor control, generalized use of the affected upper extremity, and self-efficacy. Interview findings provided valuable information about the experiences of participants with the approach; the interview respondents enjoyed the increased sense of responsibility that came with problem solving on their own, but expressed a desire to have ongoing professional support. Suggestions for modifications to CO-OP for use adults with stroke are made. CO-OP is a promising approach to improve functional independence in adults with stroke. Future research is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".