MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567677177 · doi:10.1089/bio.2016.0053

Quality Matters: 2016 Annual Conference of the National Infrastructures for Biobanking

2016· article· en· W2567677177 on OpenAlexafffund
Marika Doucet, Karl‐Friedrich Becker, Jens Björkman, Jacques Bonnet, Bruno Clément, Maria Grazia Daidone, Charles Duyckaerts, Gilles Erb, Helmuth Haslacher, Paul Hofman, Berthold Huppertz, Christophe Junot, Joakim Lundeberg, Andres Metspalu, Marialuisa Lavitrano, Jan‐Eric Litton, Helen M. Moore, Manuel M. Morente, Benyoussef Naïmi, Uwe Oelmueller, Bill Ollier, Liang-Liang Ruan, Giorgio Stanta, Paola Turano, Jim Vaught, Peter H. Watson, H.‐Erich Wichmann, Martin Yuille, Myriam Zaomi, Kurt Zatloukal, Georges Dagher

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopreservation and Biobanking · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersBC Cancer AgencyUniversità degli Studi di TriesteMedical Research CouncilUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsArt historyLibrary scienceArtHumanitiesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Controlling pre-analytical factors 2. Present and future of biobanking: biobanking infrastructures and next-generation biobanking 3. Quality control in genomics 4. Quality control in biobanks 5. Quality control in cell cultures and liquid biopsies 6. Quality control in metabolomics 7. Quality assurance in biobanking

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopreservation and BiobankingSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207