MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567963993 · doi:10.1109/taes.2017.2650778

Robust Adaptive Tracking of Rigid-Body Motion With Applications to Asteroid Proximity Operations

2017· article· en· W2567963993 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)QuaternionAdaptive controlDual quaternionParametric statisticsSpacecraftComputer scienceRigid bodyTracking (education)Attitude controlRobust controlPosition (finance)TrajectoryController (irrigation)Control engineeringEngineeringControl systemControl (management)MathematicsAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the coupled position- and attitude-tracking control of a rigid spacecraft in the proximity of asteroids, where multiple, complicated, unknown perturbations resulting from highly uncertain environment must be dealt with. Dual quaternions are used to formulate the tracking error dynamics in a compact manner for unified translational and rotational control law design. A robust adaptive control scheme is then developed from an originally model-dependent controller by introducing an adaptive algorithm to dynamically adjust the compensation for perturbations due to parametric uncertainties and external disturbances. The proposed method has a simple structure and is computationally efficient, since it requires no information about the unknown perturbations and involves only two adaptive variables. Numerical simulations for asteroid landing and hovering control are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it