Non‐GMO potato lines with an altered starch biosynthesis pathway confer increased‐amylose and resistant starch properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lack of a gene marker directly affecting starch biosynthesis in the potato tuber is documented. The absence of a 454 bp amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) Solanum tuberosum fragment was identified in the wild potato species Solanum sandemanii and its absence results in a combined increased‐amylose/high‐sugar tuber chemotype. The trait is recessive, termed IAm (Increased Amylose) and was transferred to modern tetraploid S. tuberosum potato cultivars by marker‐assisted crossing. Compared to controls, IAm plants had a larger number of stems and air exposed stolons, their tubers were smaller, elongated, and they were irregularly shaped. IAm starch had 28–59% higher amylose content than control starch, the starch granules were small and grossly misshaped, they had reduced crystallinity, swelling, and viscosity, reduced in vitro digestion rates with increased resistant starch fraction. The primary gene(s) responsible for the IAm phenotype is not known, but increased granule‐associated phosphorylase (Pho1) and reduced starch synthase (SS) protein and enzyme activity in the IAm plants might explain the effects on starch structure. The data support the establishment of non‐genetically modified crops with health‐related slowly digestible carbohydrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".