MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568332192 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005203

The Case for Maternal Postpartum Deworming

2017· article· en· W2568332192 on OpenAlexafffund
Layla S. Mofid, Theresa W. Gyorkos

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInternational Development Research CentreBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsDewormingMedicineNeglected tropical diseasesPostpartum periodObstetricsPregnancyEnvironmental healthBiologyHelminthsImmunologyPathologyPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Worms and WomenInfection with Ascaris lumbricoides (roundworm), Trichuris trichiura (whipworm), and Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale (hookworms)-collectively referred to as the soiltransmitted helminths (STHs)-are among the most prevalent infections of humankind, cooccurring on all inhabited continents [1].Those most vulnerable, who reside in endemic areas where adverse health, social, and economic conditions predominate, carry the greatest STHattributable disease burden [2].STHs contribute to malnutrition through blood loss, iron deficiency anemia, and nutrient malabsorption [3].STHs have been linked to impaired growth, cognitive deficits, lower educational achievement, and reduced economic productivity in adulthood [4], thus perpetuating the cycle of poverty into future generations.Periodic preventive chemotherapy (PC) with anthelminthic drugs (i.e., deworming) is the cornerstone of prevention and control measures against STH infections in highly endemic areas [2].The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that PC programs target the three groups at highest risk of infection: school-aged children (SAC), preschool-aged children (pre-SAC), and women of reproductive age (WRA).The WHO Preventive Chemotherapy Databank reports on deworming coverage for SAC and pre-SAC; however, no coverage estimates are available for deworming in WRA, and few countries include this risk group among deworming activities.In fact, the disease burden of STHs in WRA is largely unknown.In sub-Saharan Africa alone, it has been estimated that almost 40 million WRA are infected with hookworm, including more than a quarter of pregnant women (26.7%) [5].Here, we discuss the need for including WRA in large-scale national deworming programs as a means of improving their own health, the health of their children, and as a strategy to complement global strategic plans for STH control. Current Deworming Strategies and 2020 TargetsIn 2012, WHO proposed a strategic plan to eliminate STHs as a public health problem in children by 2020 [2].Specific targets include at least 75% coverage of PC in SAC and pre-SAC living in endemic areas.However, recent predictive modelling suggests that current PC efforts targeting children may not be sufficient to meet the 2020 goal of controlling STHs without improving coverage and including WRA, particularly in regions where hookworm infection predominates [6].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS neglected tropical diseasesSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207