MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568516282 · doi:10.2118/75128-pa

The Effect of Heterogeneity on In-Situ Combustion: Propagation of Combustion Fronts in Layered Porous Media

2005· article· en· W2568516282 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Yücel Akkutlu, Yannis C. Yortsos

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombustionPorous mediumPermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityIn situMechanicsMaterials scienceThermalChemistryThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysicsMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In-situ combustion is a potential method for the recovery of heavy oil. The effect of reservoir heterogeneity, a ubiquitous feature of oil reservoirs, on in-situ combustion has not been systematically addressed in prior studies, however. In this paper, we present analytical models for filtration combustion, namely the combustion of a stationary solid fuel, in the specific case where the reservoir consists of two layers of different permeability and thickness, separated by nearly impermeable shales. We investigate the conditions for the propagation of steady combustion fronts as a function of some key parameters, including the permeability-thickness contrast R between the layers, the thickness ratio η, and the external heat loss coefficient h. We find that heterogeneity acts in two distinct ways: It reduces the temperature of the leading front in the high-permeability layer in all cases, and uncouples the propagation of the fronts in the two layers if R is smaller than a critical value Rc. The first effect may lead to low-temperature oxidation conditions, and therefore to the effective extinction of the front in the high-permeability layer. The second leads to a reduced sweep efficiency (and early breakthrough). However, if R exceeds the critical value, the fronts in the two layers travel coherently (with the same speed). This coherence is identified for the first time. The resulting thermal coupling greatly retards the front in the more permeable layer, and accelerates only slightly that in the less permeable one, until the two fronts reach a common velocity. We study the effects of R, the heat loss rate, and the ratio of thickness η. The coupling is aided by moderate heat losses (small h), and smaller η, which affect the critical value Rc.Asinthe homogeneous case, at sufficiently high heat loss rates, steady front propagation cannot be sustained and the combustion process becomes extinct. The work is useful for the understanding of the viability of in-situ combustion process in heterogeneous layered reservoirs and the effect of a number of injection, combustion, and reservoir parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207