Dialectalismos fonéticos en los escritores extremeños finiseculares: el ejemplo de Extremeñas, de Gabriel y Galán
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolA finales del siglo XIX irrumpen en el panorama literario espanol autores que tratan de reflejar fielmente el habla de las zonas en que viven. La maxima expresion de esta tendencia en Extremadura es atribuida a Jose Maria Gabriel y Galan, autor de Extremenas (1903), un poemario que rescata la figura del olvidado y sufrido labrador extremeno. En este articulo proponemos un analisis de los dialectalismos foneticos recurrentes en la obra de Gabriel y Galan a partir de “El embargo”, uno de los poemas mas reconocidos del escritor. El estudio de este texto servira para ofrecer una vision del arquetipo de las hablas extremenas en la literatura. Como se vera, gran parte de los fenomenos recogidos por el poeta no son dialectalismos, sino vulgarismos extendidos por otros dominios hispanicos cuya confluencia permite recrear una variedad linguistica proxima a la de los protagonistas de la intrahistoria del pueblo extremeno que Gabriel y Galan define en su obra. EnglishAuthors trying to capture the speech of the areas they live in burst into the Spanish literary panorama at the end of the 19th century. Jose Maria Gabriel y Galan is sometimes regarded as the most significant example of in such respect in Extremadura. He is the author of Extremenas (1903), a set of poems which bring to the fore the figure of the forgotten and long-suffering Extremenian ploughman. In this research paper a study of phonetic dialectalisms will be carried out in Gabriel y Galan’s ‘El embargo’, one of his best known poems. The analysis will offer a comprehensive vision of the archetype for Extremenian varieties in literature. As will be discussed, many of the features dealt with by the poet are not dialectalisms as such, but vulgarisms found throughout Spain, whose conjunction makes it possible to reproduce that linguistic variety spoken by the people defined by Gabriel y Galan in his work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".