MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2569142512 · doi:10.1109/icrai.2016.7791237

Adaptive robust control for bilateral teleoperated robotic manipulators with arbitrary time delays

2016· article· en· W2569142512 on OpenAlexaff
Moyang Zou, Ya‐Jun Pan, Shane Forbrigger, Usman Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationRobot manipulatorComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Adaptive controlRobust controlTeleroboticsControl engineeringControl (management)RobotMobile robotControl systemArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bilateral teleoperation systems have been extensively developed over decades. Communication delay is one of the most challenging control design problems. Additionally, nonlinearity, parameter variation, and uncertainty in the environment dynamics and robot model are also challenging issues that should be taken into account for excellent control performance. In our work, we propose a globally stable non-linear adaptive robust control structure is proposed, dealing with the following problems. Firstly, this new control structure can tolerate arbitrary, long, and time-varying delays. Secondly, a nonlinear adaptive robust control scheme is proposed to stabilize the system under nonlinearities, unknown parameters, modeling errors and uncertainties in the system, in order to ensure excellent tracking performance on both sides. Thirdly, an environmental torque estimator is designed to estimate immeasurable torques by a least square adaptive law. Moreover, a novel structure of communication block is developed. The master trajectory is sent to the slave side. However, from the slave side to the master side, estimated parameters of the environmental torque are transmitted back. This structure is designed to enhance the control performance of the adaptive robust controller. To ensure the desired transparency performance, an impedance control structure is developed on the master side. The proposed approach can guarantee robust stability, excellent transparency and synchronization under arbitrary time-varying delays. In simulation, two 2-DoF robotic manipulators are considered to verify the effectiveness of the control design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207