MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Risk of Dialysis Access Thrombosis Is Related to Polymorphisms in the Transforming Growth Factor-β1 and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-Type 1 Genes.

2005· article· en· W2569824063 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro Lazo‐Langner, Greg Knoll, Philip S. Wells, Rachel M. Pilkey, Nancy Carson, Marc Rodger

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasminogen activator inhibitor-1Plasminogen activatorThrombophiliaThrombosisInternal medicineTransforming growth factorHaplotypeMedicineImmunologyBiologyGenotypeGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is involved in cell growth and differentiation and it plays an important role in the genesis of fibrosis through the stimulation of neointima proliferation and accumulation of components of the extracellular matrix and it has been suggested that polymorphisms (polym) in its gene contribute to determining the patency of the vascular access (VA) in patients (pts) on hemodialysis (HD) by contributing to both atherogenesis and VA thrombosis. On the other hand it has been demonstrated that polym in the gene encoding the plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) are a risk factor for ischemic heart disease and possibly stroke although their role in other vascular territories is unknown. It is also known that TGF-β1 is an important up-regulator of the PAI-1 gene. Methods. We conducted a case-control study to determine the relationship between TGF-β1 polym of the signal sequence (869 T>C; 915 G>C) and VA thrombosis in 416 HD pts. (107 with VA thrombosis, 309 controls had no thrombosis). We also explored for possible interactions with the 4G/5G polym of the PAI-1 gene. TGF-β1 and PAI-1 polym were amplified using PCR and genotyped using an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer. TGF-β1 producing haplotypes (haplo) were defined as low, intermediate or high as previously reported. All pts were also tested for thrombophilia. Statistical analysis was done using univariate and multivariate logistic regression adjusted for thrombophilia, age, access type, etc. Results. Frequencies for low, intermediate and high TGF-β1 producing haplo were 9.3, 26.2 and 64.5% in cases and 2.6, 22.3 and 75.1% in controls. Odds of thrombosis for TGF-β1 haplotypes Haplotype Crude OR (95% CI) p Adjusted OR (95% CI) p High producing haplotype is reference category Low 5.11 (1.93, 13.5) 0.001 7.31 (2.15, 24.88) 0.001 Intermediate 1.30 (0.74, 2.29) 0.36 1.39 (0.70, 2.75) 0.35 Figure Figure Frequencies for 5G/5G, 4G/5G and 4G/4G PAI-1 polym. were 21.5, 56.1 and 22.4% in cases and 25.6, 50.2 and 24.3% in controls respectively. When we explored the interaction between both gene polym we found a highly significant result for the interaction between the low TGF-β1 producers and the 4G/4G PAI-1 polym (adjusted OR 19.3; 95% CI 2.82, 132.40; p=0.003). Conclusions. Our results show that intermediate and high producing TGF-β1 haplo have a protective effect against VA thrombosis in HD patients that is not modified by PAI-1 polym and also suggest that the interaction between low TGF-β1 producing haplo and the 4G/4G PAI-1 polym might be an important contributor to thrombosis of the VA in HD pts. Further studies are ongoing to determine the relationship between TGF-β1 haplo, TGF-β1 level, and PAI-1 polym with thrombosis in this and other populations as well as to clarify the mechanisms underlying this apparently paradoxical effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207