MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2569901810 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793653

A capacitor voltage balancing method for cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters with application to FACTS

2016· article· en· W2569901810 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Amini, Mehrdad Moallem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorTransformerH bridgeVoltageComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAC powerTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPulse-width modulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters have attracted considerable attention in applications such as reactive power compensation, solid-state transformers, and PV systems. The main disadvantage of CHBMLI in these applications is the imbalance of the DC capacitor voltages, especially in high-level inverters. The DC-link voltage unbalance increases the stress on the semiconductor devices and may cause serious damages. To overcome this issue, this paper presents a new DC-link capacitor voltage balancing method for CHBMLI. This method has a very effective and fast voltage balancing capability. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm is independent of the number of modules and voltage distribution; therefore, it could be applied to any CHBMLI regardless of its number of cells and levels without considerable modification. This method reduces computation efforts that makes it suitable for high-cell-number inverters. To verify the performance of the proposed modulation scheme, the proposed method is applied to a four-cell CHBMLI, utilized in STATCOM applications, using simulation studies through the PSCAD/EMTDC <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> software package. The simulation results show the effectiveness of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207