MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2570882597 · doi:10.2527/jas.2016.0926

Impacts of a leptin SNP on growth performance and carcass characters in finishing steers studied over time

2017· article· en· W2570882597 on OpenAlexaff
P.J. Kononoff, P. J. Defoor, Michael Engler, R. S. Swingle, J. F. Gleghorn, S. T. James, F. L. S. Marquess

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeAnimal scienceLeptinBiologyDry matterCarcass weightAlleleBeef cattleBody weightObesityEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 2,948 steers (mean initial BW = 568.9 ± 49.4 kg) were used to evaluate the effect of the LEP R25C SNP genotype on feed intake, growth performance, and carcass characteristics over time. Steers were grouped into 5 blocks, each consisting of 10 pens initially, and then at approximately 24 d prior to the assigned slaughter date, cattle in each pen were randomly selected either to remain in the pen they were in (group A) or to be assigned to a new pen (group B). Steers were allocated to 5 blocks and 6 harvest weeks (-3, -2, 0, 2, 3, and 4 wk) relative to the projected end point. Steers were weighed and ultrasound scanned at 60 and 1 d prior to harvest. Leptin genotype affected ( ≤ 0.011) 12th-rib fat and i.m. fat percentage (IMF) for each slaughter group at both 60 and 1 d prior to slaughter, although rib eye area (REA) was not affected ( = 0.773) by leptin genotype 60 d prior to slaughter in any group. Time affected ( < 0.001) live BW as well as 12th-rib fat, REA, and IMF measured 60 and 1 d prior to each slaughter time. Dry matter intake was also higher ( = 0.003) for cattle of the animals homozygous for the T allele (TT) genotype compared to those with the animals homozygous for the C allele (CC) genotype (9.59 vs. 9.29 ± 0.075 kg). The LEP R25C genotype affected key traits related to carcass fatness; specifically, compared to cattle of the CC genotype, cattle of the TT genotype had a higher ( = 0.016) calculated empty body fat (29.1 vs. 28.8 ± 0.133%) and higher ( = 0.020 calculated yield grade (2.62 vs. 2.52 ± 0.035). Additionally, like for live measures, TT cattle tended ( = 0.093) to have a higher 12th-rib fat (13.2 vs. 12.8 ± 0.26 mm). However, the LEP R25C genotype did not affect KPH ( = 0.854) or marbling score ( = 0.240), nor did it affect any USDA quality measure ( ≥ 0.350). The leptin genotype also affected ( = 0.048) HCW, which was highest for steers of the TT genotype (400.9 vs. 403.5 ± 3.41kg). Results indicate that the leptin R25C genotype and time impacted most traits associated with fatness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207