MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Delayed Major Bleeding in Critically Ill Trauma Patients

2015· article· en· W2571269762 on OpenAlexaff
Lana A. Castellucci, Joseph R. Shaw, Grégoire Le Gal, Stephen Hawken, Lauralyn McIntyre, Marc Carrier

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Hazard ratioMajor traumaTrauma centerInjury Severity ScoreEmergency departmentAspirinRetrospective cohort studyCoagulopathyClopidogrelConfidence intervalSurgeryEmergency medicineInternal medicinePoison controlInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Trauma is the leading cause of death in persons under the age of 40 years and hemorrhage is responsible for at least 40% of trauma related deaths within the first 24 hours following injury, with up to half of patients dying before arriving to hospital. During the last several decades, the focus of research in bleeding trauma patients has been targeted at the immediate post-injury period with little emphasis on the potential for delayed hemorrhage in survivors of the first 24 hours. Methods: A retrospective review of critically ill trauma patients admitted at a tertiary care center between September 2010 and December 2011 was performed to determine the incidence of delayed major bleeding. Delayed major bleeding was defined as bleeding that occurred more than 24 hours after presentation to the emergency department. The HEME bleeding assessment tool was used to identify delayed major bleeding events. Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis was performed to assess for risk factors associated with delayed major bleeding events. Results: One hundred and fifty critically ill trauma patients were included and the incidence of delayed major bleeding was 44%. Predictors that were statistically significantly associated with delayed major bleeding included: male gender (hazard ratio (HR): 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.15-4.17), pre-injury use of the antiplatelet agents aspirin and/or clopidogrel (HR: 2.11; 95%CI: 1.07-4.18), presence of intracranial bleeding (HR: 3.05; 95%CI: 1.70-5.47), higher injury severity scores (HR: 1.12; 95%CI: 1.03-1.22), requirement of massive transfusion (HR: 2.53; 95%CI: 1.05-6.08), and low pH values (HR: 1.41; 95%CI: 1.08-1.84). Use of anticoagulant prophylaxis was not associated with delayed major bleeding. Conclusions: The rate of delayed major bleeding in this cohort of critically ill trauma patients is high. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the reported associations of gender, antecedent antiplatelet drugs, intracranial bleeding, injury severity scores, massive transfusion, and acidosis with delayed major bleeding. Disclosures Carrier: LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207