A Synthetic, X‐ray, NMR Spectroscopy and DFT Study of β‐Naphthil Dihydrazone, Di(β‐naphthyl)acetylene, Tetra(β‐naphthyl)cyclopentadienone, and Hexa(β‐naphthyl)‐benzene: C<sub>6</sub>(C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>7</sub>)<sub>6</sub> Is a Disordered Molecular Propeller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Treatment of β‐naphthil dihydrazone, 1, with silver oxide yields di(β‐naphthyl)acetylene, 2, which undergoes Diels–Alder cycloaddition with tetra(β‐naphthyl)cyclopentadienone, 4, to give hexa(β‐naphthyl)benzene, 5, upon decarbonylation. Molecules 1, 2 and 4 have been characterised by X‐ray crystallography, but hexa(β‐naphthyl)benzene exhibits rotational disorder of the peripheral substituents. Nevertheless, calculations at the density functional level reveal the favoured structure of 5 to be a molecular propeller, in which the eight possible rotamers are essentially iso‐energetic. Variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy studies yield a naphthyl rotational barrier of approximately 17 kcal mol−1, similar to that previously found for meta‐substituted phenyl groups. Enantiomerisation of hexa(β‐naphthyl)benzene engendered by rotation of a single naphthyl ring has been studied by DFT calculations, and the process has been represented pictorially.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".