MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571546563

Investigating message believability as a determinant of parents' intentions to support their children in meeting physical activity and screen time guidelines

2014· article· en· W2571546563 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jocelyn W. Jarvis, Tanya R. Berry, Valerie Carson, Ryan E. Rhodes, Amy E. Latimer‐Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of AlbertaPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPromotion (chess)LimitingControl (management)Structural equation modelingScreen timeSocial psychologyGuidelinePhysical activityDevelopmental psychologyAdvertisingMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of children are not meeting physical activity guidelines (PAG) or screen time guidelines (STG). Parents play a role in changing the health behaviours of their children by engaging in supportive behaviours (e.g., encouraging sports; limiting TV viewing). According to the social issue advertising believability model (SIABM), whether parents support their children in achieving these guidelines may depend on how believable they find guideline promotion advertisements (message believability [MB]). Whether parents find a message believable may depend upon their perceived behavioural control for engaging in supportive behaviours. The purpose of this study was to examine a) MB as a determinant of parents’ intentions to support their children in meeting the PAG and STG, and b) perceived behavioural control as a determinant of whether parents consider PAG and STG advertisements believable. A secondary objective was to examine differences in SIABM variables for PAG versus STG advertisements and for moms versus dads. Data were collected online using Survey Monkey Audience; 500 Canadian parents with at least one child aged 5-11 (75.6% moms) were recruited. A structural equation model testing the SIABM relationships demonstrated good model fit for both advertisements in the whole sample, and moms, and dads separately (CFIs≥.96; RMSEAs≤.06). Contrary to hypothesis MB did not predict intentions, and perceived behavioural control did not predict MB (ps>.05). ANOVAs revealed that parents had more positive evaluations of the PAG advertisement versus the STG advertisement; yet, had stronger intentions to support screen time reduction versus physical activity participation (ps<.05;d=.24). When considering moms and dads separately, moms believed, and had stronger attitudes towards, both advertisements than dads. Moms had greater intentions to support screen time reduction versus physical activity participation. Given that parents believe the guidelines, efforts must be directed to enhance other determinants of parental support behaviours – particularly screen time reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFrench-language works237,207