Study the optimum dimensions and operating parameters of Penning ion source
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, design and construction of a DC cold cathode Penning ion source is described. It consists of cylindrical hollow anode and two movable disc cathodes that are placed symmetrically at two ends of the anode. The electrical discharge and the output ion beam characteristics of the ion source are measured using argon gas. It is found that the optimum dimensions of anode–cathode distance, ion exit aperture diameter, and ion exit aperture – Faraday cup distance are equal to 8, 1.5, and 30 mm, respectively. The ion source efficiency was calculated at discharge current equal to 1.2 mA, different anode–cathode distances and pressures using argon gas. It is found that at anode–cathode distance equal to 8 mm and pressure equal to 7 × 10 −4 mmHg, a maximum ion source efficiency equal to 27.1% can be obtained. The surface hardness of molybdenum specimen is measured after exposure to argon ion beam for two hours at pressure equal to 7 × 10 −4 mmHg, discharge voltage equal to 3.5 kV, discharge current equal to 0.6 mA, and output ion beam current equal to 165 μA using argon gas. It is found that the surface hardness of molybdenum specimen is decreased by a factor of 24.2%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".