MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571647777 · doi:10.1016/j.proeps.2017.01.032

Thermal Springs of Gandll K’in Gwaayaay (Hot Spring Island) Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve

2017· article· en· W2571647777 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen E. Grasby, Patrick Bartier

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Earth and Planetary Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsParks CanadaGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHot springSpring (device)Geothermal gradientGeologyHydrogeologyNational parkFault (geology)ArchaeologyHydrology (agriculture)SeismologyGeographyPaleontologyEngineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gandll K’in Gwaayaay (Hot Spring Island), British Columbia Canada, geothermal system showed significant response to the October 27 2012 Haida Gwaii earthquake, including temporary flow stoppage. This indicates linkage between the hydrogeological system and seismic activity on the nearby fault. A study was initiated to assess how the spring system has changed in response to the earthquake in 2012, and whether it is it still changing, has it reached a new equilibrium and, if it has, what are the parameters of the new equilibrium. Linkages of the flow regime to seismic moment release and surface deformation measurements near Haida Gwaii were also investigated to assess if there is potential that changes in spring flow and/or chemistry may provide precursor information of near-future seismic activity. Results of this study may be used to inform decisions involving visitation by tourists, management and development of site facilities, and monitoring of the unique ecology at this site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Earth and Planetary ScienceSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207