MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2571671044 · doi:10.1113/jp273612

EAG channels expressed in microvillar photoreceptors are unsuited to diurnal vision

2017· article· en· W2571671044 on OpenAlexafffund
Esa‐Ville Immonen, Andrew S. French, Päivi H. Torkkeli, Hongxia Liu, Mikko Vähäsöyrinki, Roman V. Frolov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcademy of Finland
KeywordsDepolarizationPeriplanetaBiologyTransient receptor potential channelCell biologyBiophysicsMembrane potentialIon channelRepolarizationSodium channelElectrophysiologyNeuroscienceChemistryBiochemistryCockroachReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points The principles underlying the evolutionary selection of ion channels for expression in sensory neurons are unclear. Photoreceptor depolarization in the diurnal Drosophila melanogaster is predominantly provided by light‐activated transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, whereas repolarization is mediated by sustained voltage‐gated K+ channels of the Shab family. In the present study, we show that phototransduction in the nocturnal cockroach Periplaneta americana is predominantly mediated by TRP‐like channels, whereas membrane repolarization is based on EAG channels. Although bright light stimulates Shab channels in Drosophila, further restricting depolarization and improving membrane bandwidth, it strongly suppresses EAG conductance in Periplaneta. This light‐dependent inhibition (LDI) is caused by calcium and is abolished by chelating intracellular calcium or suppressing eag gene expression. LDI increases membrane resistance, augments gain and reduces the signalling bandwidth. This makes EAG unsuitable for light response conditioning during the day and might have resulted in the evolutionary replacement of EAG by other delayed rectifiers in diurnal insects. Abstract The principles underlying evolutionary selection of ion channels for expression in sensory neurons are unclear. Among species possessing microvillar photoreceptors, the major ionic conductances have only been identified in Drosophila melanogaster. In Drosophila, depolarization is provided by light‐activated transient receptor potential (TRP) channels with a minor contribution from TRP‐like (TRPL) channels, whereas repolarization is mediated by sustained voltage‐gated K+ (Kv) channels of the Shab family. Bright light stimulates Shab channels, further restricting depolarization and improving membrane bandwidth. In the present study, data obtained using a combination of electrophysiological, pharmacological and molecular knockdown techniques strongly suggest that in photoreceptors of the nocturnal cockroach Periplaneta americana the major excitatory channel is TRPL, whereas the predominant delayed rectifier is EAG, a ubiquitous but enigmatic Kv channel. By contrast to the diurnal Drosophila, bright light strongly suppresses EAG conductance in Periplaneta. This light‐dependent inhibition (LDI) is caused by calcium entering the cytosol and is amplified following inhibition of calcium extrusion, and it can also be abolished by chelating intracellular calcium or suppressing eag gene expression by RNA interference. LDI increases membrane resistance, augments gain and reduces the signalling bandwidth, impairing information transfer. LDI is also observed in the nocturnal cricket Gryllus integer, whereas, in the diurnal water strider Gerris lacustris, the delayed rectifier is up‐regulated by light. Although LDI is not expected to reduce delayed rectifier current in the normal illumination environment of nocturnal cockroaches and crickets, it makes EAG unsuitable for light response conditioning during the day, and might have resulted in the evolutionary replacement of EAG by other delayed rectifiers in diurnal insects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207