Non‐linear transceiver design for secure communications with artificial noise‐assisted MIMO relay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the problem of physical layer security for amplify‐and‐forward (AF) multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) relay systems operating in the presence of a passive eavesdropper. Specifically, the authors consider the robust design of an artificial noise (AN)‐assisted non‐linear transceiver employing Tomlinson–Harashima precoding (THP), with imperfect knowledge of the legitimate channel states. The design problem can be reformulated as a two‐level optimisation, where the outer problem aims to optimise the source precoder as a function of the relay precoder, while the inner problem at the relay aims to jointly optimise the relay precoder as well as the power allocation between the AN and the information‐bearing signals. To solve the inner problem, the authors adopt a bisection method which attempts to maximise the AN power level, to confuse the eavesdropper, while satisfying the mean‐squared‐error requirement for the intended user. Some relaxation for the objective function is applied to transform the problem into a standard convex optimisation one. Regarding the outer problem, closed‐form solutions for the precoders can be derived by an iterative method based on the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. Simulation results illustrate the superior secrecy performance provided by the proposed non‐linear transceiver design with AN and THP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".