MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572783712 · doi:10.22621/cfn.v124i1.1043

"Amphibian Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques" edited by Kenneth Dodd. 2010. [book review]

2010· article· en· W2572783712 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Francis R. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmphibianEnvironmental ethicsEcologyBiologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amphibians, the original pioneering land vertebrates, have survived their displacement from former dominance by more advanced vertebrates as numerous and diverse, generally relatively small, forms.These include the familiar and widely distributed frogs, the northern temperate and tropical American salamanders, and the tropical caecilians.These, however, are now regarded by many leading researchers as faced with a new wave of extinctions due to increasing loss of habitat, chemical residues pollution, and the spread of devastating disease.As a consequence, their study and habitat management is widely pronounced as an immediate world conservation priority.It is estimated that of the 6400 modern species described to date, one-third are threatened and 168 are judged now extinct.As well, an unknown number of yet undescribed species may disappear before they are found.The purpose of this book is present a comprehensive survey of the current state of research on amphibians.To accomplish this, editor Dodds has enlisted contributions from 52 herpetologists.Americans dominate, only nine are from elsewhere, one each residing in Australia, Brazil, Germany, France, Panama, Russia, Switzerland, Tanzania, and the United Kingdom.That none are from Canada does not fairly reflect the active research and conservation initiatives, past and current, here.The text is divided into six parts containing 27 chapters in all.Part 1 is an overview on diversity and life history ending with why amphibian declines matter, and a chapter on field study objectives.Chapters in Part 2 concentrate on larvae and included chapters are on morphology, sampling, dietary assessments; mesocosms, and water quality criteria.Part 3 focuses on juveniles and adults containing chapters on measuring and marking post-metamorphs, egg mass and nest count, dietary assessments of adults, movement patterns and radiotelemetry, field enclosures and terrestrial cages.Part 4 deals with population: drift fences,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207