Sputtering and amorphization of crystalline semiconductors by Nanodroplet Bombardment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this review we expose how Nanodroplet Bombardment of surfaces by charged particles produced through electrospray atomization offers unparalleled opportunities for surface engineering of chemically inert crystalline materials. The sputtering yields and rates are comparable or higher than reactive etching techniques and significantly higher than other physical sputtering systems. Moreover, bombardment can amorphatize a thin layer of the target. The imposed physical characteristics of the electrospray, droplet diameter, molecular mass of the spray, and kinetic energy will determine the sputtering and amorphization efficiency, and the topography of the processed target. Molecular dynamics studies have clarified the mechanisms of both processes; amorphous layers appear due to ultra‐fast quenching of melted target pools around the impact area while sputtering is driven by a combination of collision cascades, thermal evaporation, and, for large and fast projectiles, of hydrodynamic forces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it