MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2573069183 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.1.1

Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.

2009· article· en· W2573069183 on OpenAlexaff
Sam Schulman, Henry Eriksson, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Ajay K. Kakkar, Clive Kearon, Patrick Mismetti, Sebastian Schellong, David Baanstra, Janet Schnee

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDabigatranWarfarinHazard ratioConfidence intervalDirect thrombin inhibitorInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialAdverse effectSurgeryAnesthesiaAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1 Background. The direct oral thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative to warfarin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods. In a randomized, double-blind, trial of 2539 patients with acute VTE, treated with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin for 5 to 11 days, we compared oral dabigatran etexilate, 150 mg twice daily in a fixed-dose, with warfarin dose-adjusted to an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 and 3.0, each given for 6 months. The primary outcome was symptomatic, objectively confirmed recurrent VTE or VTE-related death up to 6 months of treatment. Safety endpoints included bleeding events, acute coronary syndrome, liver function tests, vital signs and adverse events. Results. Of 1274 patients randomized to dabigatran etexilate, at 6 months 30 (2.4%) had recurrent VTE compared with 27 (2.2%) of 1265 patients randomized to warfarin; risk difference 0.4% [95 percent confidence interval, −0.8 to 1.5]; p<0.0001 for prespecified non-inferiority margin. During the planned study participation, through the end of the follow-up period, there were 34 vs. 32 patients who had recurrent VTE in the dabigatran etexilate vs. warfarin treated groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.065 to 1.70]). Major bleeding occurred in 20 patients treated with dabigatran etexilate and 24 patients treated with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.48) and any bleeding occurred in 207 versus 280 patients, respectively (hazard ratio 0.71, 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.85). Death, acute coronary syndromes, and liver function test abnormalities were infrequent and similar in the two groups. Conclusion: Fixed-dose dabigatran etexilate is as effective and safe as warfarin in the treatment of acute VTE. Disclosures: Schulman: GSK: Honorarium for Chairman of the IDMC; Bayer HealthCare: Honorarium for Chairman of the DSMB; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honorarium for Chairman of the Steering Committee; Sanofi-Aventis: Honorarium for Chairman of the DSMB, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral thrombin inhibitor under investigation for anticoagulant prophylaxis or treatment in venous and arterial thrombomebolism. Kakkar:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Bristol–Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Aryx therapeutics: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria. Schellong:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Scientific Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Scientific Advisory Board; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Scientific Advisory Board; Bristol–Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Scientific Advisory Board; Esai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Scientific Advisory Board; Aryx therapeutics: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria. Baanstra:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Employment. Schnee:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→