Kruppel-Like Factor, Klf9, Promotes Proliferation of Notch-Independent Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 3496 Notch1 signaling is required at multiple stages of normal T-lymphocyte development. Notch1 is a transmembrane receptor that is physiologically activated when Notch ligands induce conformational changes that allow Notch1 cleavage by the intramembranous γ-secretase complex, releasing active intracellular Notch1 (ICN1) fragment from the plasma membrane. Activating NOTCH1 mutations are very frequent in human and mouse T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-LL). Typically, these mutations promote ligand-independent Notch1 cleavage by γ-secretase or increase ICN1 stability by truncating the C-terminal PEST domain. Understandably, much effort has focused on elucidating mechanisms of normal and oncogenic Notch1 signaling. However, some studies suggest that the absence of NOTCH1 mutations portends a worse prognosis for human T-LL. Therefore, we set out to define signals that promote proliferation and survival of T-LL cells lacking activated Notch1. We used Western blotting to detect γ-secretase cleaved ICN1 protein in a cohort of 35 primary T-LLs that developed spontaneously in mice lacking the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (Atm) tumor suppressor. We identified 3 ICN1 subgroups: 63% expressed PEST-truncated ICN1 (T-ICN1); 17% expressed non-truncated ICN1 (NT-ICN1); and 20% had undetectable ICN1 (UD-ICN1), most lacked Notch1 mRNA. We confirmed the difference in Notch transcriptional activity and functional dependence between the UD-ICN1 and T-ICN1 subgroups and then compared their gene expression profiles to define pathways unique to the UD-ICN1 group. Gene set enrichment analyses revealed that UD-ICN1 T-LLs expressed higher levels of Klf9 and other transcription factors associated with a highly proliferative stage of normal T-cell development. siRNA knock-down studies demonstrated that Klf9 promoted proliferation of UD-ICN1 but not T-ICN1 T-LL cells. Collectively, these data demonstrate that Klf9 can regulate proliferation of Notch-independent T-LLs and suggest that Klf9 may provide a novel therapeutic target for human T-LLs lacking activating NOTCH1 mutations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".