MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573364648 · doi:10.1177/1077699015610327hh

Book Review: <i>Television and the Self: Knowledge, Identity, and Media Representation</i> , edited by Kathleen M. Ryan and Deborah A. Macey

2015· article· en· W2573364648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy Muckleroy Carwile

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyMedia studiesEntertainmentIdentity (music)Representation (politics)AutoethnographyMasculinityGender studiesArtPoliticsLawPolitical scienceVisual artsAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Television and the Self: Knowledge, Identity, and Media Representation. Kathleen M. Ryan and Deborah A. Macey, eds. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2013. 304 pp. $75.00 hbk. $44.99 pbk. $44.99 ebk.As I read each of the well-written and researched chapters of this edited volume, I kept coming back to this quote from the editors on page 1 that says this book is half-jokingly referred to as Everything I Know I Learned from Television. Indeed, this volume contains many studies from many perspectives about television and the ways that we, as societal beings, learn from it.Kathleen M. Ryan, an associate professor in the College of Media, Communication & Information at the University of Colorado-Boulder, and Deborah A. Macey, a visiting assistant professor in the College of Communication at Saint Louis University, have compiled a volume useful in entertainment theory, family communication, or media studies at the graduate level. Each of the five sections of the book use television as a lens to examine how we learn something through our viewing of television. five sections are The Electronic Hearth, Father and Mother Know Best, Family Ties, The Facts of Life, and As Not Seen on TV.From learning who we are from a nationalist perspective to gender roles, this book has it all. In Chapter 2, autoethnography was used to analyze how television taught the author her Polish identity after she immigrated to Canada as a child. Another chapter about Space Rangers and masculinity argues thatthe rocketmen also taught their young viewers about the roles they would be expected to play in the nearer-future world of their adulthood. They served as exemplars of social, political, and particularly masculine success in a rapidly changing world, thwarting evil, defending democracy, and embodying virtues that advanced the common good.Another chapter about Bette White compared her with the Greek goddesses Aphrodite, Persephone, and Demeter.Another chapter's findings regarding gender roles and advertising for tweens on Nickelodeon suggest that the commercial culture on Nickelodeon does not strongly contribute to producing girl power products or to empowered viewers in the positive ways afforded to female characters in the corresponding television programs. Another chapter argues thatif gay men, as conspicuous consumers of the images and the messages conveyed to them, are to adopt practices that render older gay men and gay elders intelligible within the discursive system of ageism, they must begin to demand more accurate, comprehensive portrayals of themselves across the larger spectrum of chronological ages. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207