MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573648939 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2016-0458

Tree squirrel abundance and demography in managed coniferous forests of British Columbia are within the range of natural fluctuations of old-growth stands

2017· article· en· W2573648939 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Thomas P. Sullivan, Douglas B. Ransome, Druscilla S. Sullivan, Pontus M.F. Lindgren, Walt Klenner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of ForestsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)EcologyRange (aeronautics)Old-growth forestBasal areaBiologyForestryTemperate rainforestPopulationGeographyDemographyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus Exrleben) and northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus Shaw) are important mammal species in coniferous forests that are widely distributed across temperate and boreal ecological zones. Although T. hudsonicus and G. sabrinus apparently prefer late-successional forests, their population dynamics show no clear pattern in young second-growth and old-growth conifer forests. We used a compilation of study results that had standardized methodology and sampling effort to compare tree squirrel responses across a range of forest conditions. We tested the hypotheses (H) that abundance, reproduction, recruitment, and survival would be higher in (H 1 ) old-growth than second-growth stands, (H 2 ) unthinned than thinned second-growth stands, and (H 3 ) lightly than heavily thinned stands. Tree squirrel populations in old-growth stands were considered the “standard” treatment to which other treatments in second-growth stands (unthinned and variously thinned) were compared. Thinned stands were grouped into low, medium, and high densities of trees. Datasets from seven published studies included 2804 Tamiasciurus and 837 G. sabrinus individuals, 25 study years, and 158 trapping periods. Mean abundance of Tamiasciurus was similar among treatment stands, ranging from 0.62 to 1.29·ha −1 . Mean numbers of G. sabrinus were highest in old-growth stands at 0.65·ha −1 , followed by the low- and medium-density stands at 0.50·ha −1 , the high-density stands at 0.25·ha −1 , and finally the unthinned second-growth stands at a low of 0.12·ha −1 . In terms of effect size, mean proportional change in abundance, relative to that within old-growth stands, of both squirrel species in the three thinned stands were within the range of natural fluctuations in old-growth stands. Populations of Tamiasciurus in the unthinned stands were not within the range of fluctuations in the old-growth stands. Mean number of successful pregnancies and total recruits were similar among stands for Tamiasciurus, with variability in female breeding and winter survival. Mean number of recruits of G. sabrinus was highest in old-growth stands with no other differences in demographic attributes among stands. The biological significance of these differences in demographic variables was small in terms of effect sizes. Tamiasciurus and G. sabrinus seem to persist in a relatively broad range of young managed forest habitats, as well as in old-growth stands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207