Scaling Laws for the Longitudinal Structure Function in the Atmospheric Surface Layer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Scaling laws for the longitudinal structure function in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) are studied using dimensional analysis and matched asymptotics. Theoretical predictions show that the logarithmic scaling for the scales larger than those of the inertial subrange recently proposed for neutral wall-bounded flows also holds for the shear-dominated ASL composed of weakly unstable, neutral, and all stable conditions (as long as continuous turbulence exists). A 2/3 power law is obtained for buoyancy-dominated ASLs. Data from the Advection Horizontal Array Turbulence Study (AHATS) field experiment confirm these scalings, and they also show that the length scale formed by the friction velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate consistently outperforms the distance from the ground z as the relevant scale in all cases regardless of stability. With this new length scale, the production range of the longitudinal structure function collapses for all measurement heights and stability conditions. A new variable to characterize atmospheric stability emerges from the theory: namely, the ratio between the buoyancy flux and the TKE dissipation rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".