MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2573935049 · doi:10.1109/cloud.2016.0108

SDN-Based Framework for Infrastructure as a Service Clouds

2016· article· en· W2573935049 on OpenAlexaff
Heli Amarasinghe, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningCloud computingVirtualizationScalabilityQuality of serviceDistributed computingSoftware deploymentNetwork virtualizationResource management (computing)Virtual networkOverhead (engineering)Context (archaeology)Computer networkResource allocationSoftware-defined networkingVirtual machineDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) has attracted significant attention from cloud research communities. While compute and storage resource management has been developed and studied to a greater extent, the use of network resource management in the context of IaaS is still in its early stages. There is a need for a comprehensive virtualization framework capable of providing users with low-level network and compute resource control while improving underlying resource utilization. We propose a Software-Defined Networking (SDN) IaaS framework that explicitly integrates network virtualization, including computing and storage, into a cloud platform. Our proposed framework abstracts data-center compute and network resources into a virtualized pool of resources, links them to logically compose virtual networks, and performs automated configurations to serve IaaS requests from users. We designed and constructed an SDN test-bed to verify the operation of the proposed framework. We successfully demonstrated our system's ability to meet our design objectives: (i) providing high degree of control over connectivity and Quality of Service (QoS), (ii) fully automated service delivery, (iii) fast and low overhead resource provisioning. We evaluated the feasibility and scalability of the proposed framework using statistics gathered from its deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207