MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2575002851 · doi:10.1182/blood.v104.11.213.213

Identification of Oncogenic Collaborators Providing Insights into the Tumor Suppressing Function of the Eed Polycomb Group (PcG) Gene.

2004· article· en· W2575002851 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Sauvageau, Julie Lessard Post-Doc, Michelle Miller, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyInsertional mutagenesisCarcinogenesisPolycomb-group proteinsGeneCancer researchMutantMyeloidMolecular biologyGeneticsGene expressionRepressor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are key regulators of normal and leukemic hematopoiesis (Lessard and Sauvageau, Nature 2003; Lessard and al., Genes Dev 1999). The eed gene is part of a PcG complex together with Ezh2 and Suz12. Evidence from our laboratory indicates that eed plays a crucial role in the negative regulation of the proliferative capacity of lymphoid and myeloid progenitors, suggesting that this PcG gene is a tumor suppressor. Interestingly, the human eed locus is in a region of chromosome 11 (11q14.2-22.3) which is associated with recurrent deletions in several reported cases of B-CLL, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and T-PLL. We now show that when exposed to ionizing radiation at 5 weeks of age, both eedhypo/hypo and eednull/+ mutant mice developed mono- or oligoclonal B and T cell lymphomas with much shorter latencies than observed in littermate controls (50% lethality at 16 wks; 27 wks and 34 wks post-irradiation for eedhypo/hypo, eednull/+ and controls, respectively). We reasoned that new pathways involved in tumorigenesis could be at play in this eed sensitized background, potentially allowing for the identification of new oncogenic collaborators. Therefore, a proviral insertional mutagenesis screen was conducted. Neonatal MMLV infection of eed mutant mice dramatically accelerated the occurrence of B and T cell lymphomas (50% lethality at 16 wks; 22 wks and 26 wks post-infection for eedhypo/hypo,eedhypo/+ and controls, respectively). To characterize retroviral insertions inverse-PCR (IPCR) was performed using genomic DNA isolated from 32 eedhypo/hypo and 27 wild-type tumors. More than 780 IPCR products were recovered and purified. To date, at least 140 retroviral insertion sites (RIS) have been cloned, sequenced and mapped against the mouse genome. Of these, 7 insertion targeting gene loci known to be cancer-related, like Pim1 (n= 7 tumors), Notch1 (n= 14 tumors) and c-Myc (n= 3 tumors) have been identified. In addition, 8 new common insertion sites (CIS), such as Socs1 (n= 6 tumors), Gadd45g (n= 5 tumors) and Fgfr3 (n= 6 tumors) have also been identified. Rearrangements of the Pim1 locus were found in more than 22% of the eed1989/1989 mutant mice whereas none could be found in wild-type littermates. Moreover, RT-PCR analysis indicates that the Pim1 gene is clearly overexpressed in 6 out of 16 eed1989/1989 tumors analyzed compared to wild-type, further supporting a key role for the Pim1 pathway in eed sensitized tumor cells. Thus, the data presented in this study provide evidence that eed has tumor suppressing function. It also points to a novel mechanism of tumor suppression by a PcG protein. Based on these results, it will be interesting to study the status of eed and of the newly identified CISs in human diseases associated with deletions of 11q14.2-22.3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→