MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575174654 · doi:10.5539/ass.v13n2p41

Effects of Community Based Learning in Ceramic, Sakraloke’s Sukhothai

2017· article· en· W2575174654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnglish Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Descriptive statisticsSample (material)SociologyPlan (archaeology)EngineeringGeographyMathematicsStatisticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purposes of this research were 1) to establish the community-based learning process of Sukhothai Sangkhalok ceramic work; 2) to design Sangkhalok ceramics for marketing competitiveness and community economic development; and 3) to evaluate the learning outcome of student with the community on Sukhothai Sankhalok designs. The research involved a simple-random sample of 40 second year students majoring product and packaging design of the Department of Art and Design. The community-based learning model in Sukhothai Sankhalok ceramic work as a research tool consisted of the learning plan, activities, and evaluation form. The researcher undertook a field work to collect data from the 3 Sangkhalok ceramics manufacturers in Sukhothai province, namely: 1) Suthep Sangkhalok, Tambon Muang Kao, Amphur Muang Suthothai; 2) Usa Sangkhalok Tambon Muang Kao, Amphur Muang Suthothai 3) Bua Sangkhalok, Tambon Muang Kao, Amphur Muang Suthothai. The data analysis focused on 2 areas, i.e. the analysis of ceramics community on its history, community’s operation model, and the analysis of students’ learning outcome. The analysis employed descriptive statistics and a comparison of learning outcomes against the 80 % criterion with one-sample statistics. The findings suggested that the community-based learning model of Sukhothai Sangkhaloke ceramic work as obtained in this research comprised 4 components: 1) strengthening community economics and community enterprise development; 2) promoting participatory learning process; 3) naintaining and building the capacity of local wisdom, and 4) building network and collaboration to link the knowledge and local wisdom. The Sangkhalok ceramic design works were in 3 collections: 1) Sangkhalok ceramics in swan shape with decorating technique of color painting under the glaze, in 4 styles, and 2) Sangkhalok ceramics in dragon shape with decorating technique of gold color water drawing, in 4 styles, and 3) Sangkhalok in Ganesh shape, in 3 styles. Students who designed the ceramics by the concept of Sukhothai ceramic art model showed the learning outcome with average scores at 84.50 % which was higher than the set criterion at 0.05 level of significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it