MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2575671982

La asociatividad: Factor clave para el progreso en la microrregión del Río Mayo

2015· article· es· W2575671982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Javier Figueroa, Byron Castro Paz

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletí­n Informativo CEI · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el marco del Proyecto DRET: Desarrollo Rural con Enfoque Territorial en 3 Microrregiones de Cauca y Narino, auspiciado por la Organizacion Internacional para las Migraciones (OIM) y la Embajada de Canada en Colombia, y gracias a la invitacion del Dr. Edgar Jimenez Marulanda, Coordinador Regional de la OIM Narino, y de la Dra. Ana Victoria Munoz Mora del programa Migracion y Ruralidad, los magister: Javier Figueroa de la Maestria de Administracion y Competitividad, y Byron Castro Paz de la Especializacion de Alta Gerencia de la Universidad Mariana, se llevo a cabo el taller Micro Regional, realizado el dia 19 de marzo en el municipio de Colon-Genova, el cual, estuvo enfocado en la busqueda y desarrollo de propuestas con enfoque de territorio que ayuden a construir iniciativas economico-productivas, para la articulacion de las comunidades pertenecientes a la microrregion del Rio Mayo, y que agrupan municipios como: San Bernardo, El Tablon, San Jose de Alban, San Pablo, La Cruz, La Union, Belen, Colon-Genova, entre otros.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletí­n Informativo CEISame topicRegional Development and InnovationFrench-language works237,207