A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalation first‐in‐man study (phase 0) to assess the safety and efficacy of topical cytosolic phospholipase A2 inhibitor, <scp>AVX</scp>001, in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2α) is an enzyme suggested as a therapeutic target in inflammatory skin diseases. AVX001, a cPLA2α inhibitor, was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, split-design, first-in-man study in patients with mild to moderate psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate cutaneous safety and tolerability of AVX001 in doses from 0.002% to 5.0%. Safety was assessed as local skin reaction adverse events (LSRAE) grades 3-4. The secondary objective was assessment of efficacy on modified PASI (mPASI) score compared with placebo. METHODS: Of 94 randomized men, 88 completed treatment with AVX001 and placebo. The treatment period was four weeks with two-week follow-up with assessment at screening, randomization and once weekly until study end. AVX001 and placebo were applied blinded at symmetrically affected areas once daily. RESULTS: AVX001 was safe with no grades 3-4 LSRAE. A 29% reduction in mPASI was seen at the 5% dose level at week four. Post hoc analysis of combined doses of 3% and 5% showed a clinical relevant effect with 31% reduction in mPASI (P = 0.058) and statically significant reduction of the infiltration (P = 0.036). The actively treated side showed improvement in mPASI score after one week of treatment, and the observed improvement continued throughout the four weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with AVX001 is well tolerated in doses up to 5%, and showed placebo-adjusted, clinical effects at a level of statistical significance. The improvement throughout the treatment period suggests that longer treatment could conceivably result in superior efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".