Quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics with multivessel disease: a five-year registry study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term relationship between revascularization technique and health status in diabetics with multivessel disease. Methods and results: Using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, we captured 1319 diabetics with multivessel disease requiring revascularization for an acute coronary syndrome (January 2009-December 2012) and reported health status using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at baseline, 1, 3 and 5-years [599 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); 720 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)]. Adjusted analyses were performed using a propensity score-matching technique. After adjustment (including baseline SAQ domain scores), 1-year mean (95% CI) SAQ scores (range 0-100 with higher scores reflecting improved health status) were significantly greater in selected domains for CABG compared to PCI (exertional capacity: 81.7 [79.5-84.0] vs. 78.8 [76.5-81.0], P = 0.07; angina stability: 83.1 [80.4-85.9] vs. 75.0 [72.3-77.8], P < 0.001]; angina frequency 93.2 [91.6-95.0] vs. 90.0 [87.8-91.3], P = 0.003; treatment satisfaction: 93.6 [92.2-94.9] vs. 90.8 [89.2-92.0], P = 0.003; quality of life [QOL]: 83.8 [81.7-85.8] vs. 77.2 [75.2-79.2] P < 0.001). At 3-years, these benefits were attenuated (exertional capacity: 79.3 [76.9-81.7] vs. 78.7 [76.3-81.1], P = 0.734; angina stability 79.3 [76.3-82.3] vs. 75.5 [72.5-78.5], P = 0.080; angina frequency: 93.2 [91.3-95.1] vs. 90.9 [89.0-92.8], P = 0.095; treatment satisfaction: 92.5 [91.0-94.0] vs. 91.5 [90.0-93.0] P = 0.382; QOL: 83.2 [81.1-85.2] vs. 80.3 [78.2-82.4], P = 0.057). At 5-years, majority of domains were similar (exertional capacity: 77.8 [75.0-80.6] vs. 76.3 [73.2-79.3], P = 0.482; angina stability: 78.0 [74.8-81.2] vs. 74.8 [71.4-78.2], P = 0.175; angina frequency: 94.2 [92.3-96.0] vs. 90.9 [89.0-92.9], P = 0.018; treatment satisfaction: 93.7 [92.2-95.1] vs. 92.2 [90.6-93.7], P = 0.167; QOL: 84.1 [82.0-86.3] vs. 81.1 [78.8-83.4], P = 0.058). Majority in both groups remained angina-free at 5-years (75.0% vs. 70.3%, P = 0.15). Conclusion: Improvements in health status with CABG compared with PCI were not sustained long-term. This temporal sequence should be considered when contemplating a revascularization strategy in diabetics with multivessel disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".