Impact of Autologous Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy (Arcelis™) on B Cell Subsets in HIV-1-Infected Subjects Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We demonstrated the enhancement of CD8-specific responses following the administration of an immune-based therapy consisting of dendritic cells (DC) electroporated with autologous amplified HIV-1 RNA and CD40 ligand (CD40 L) RNA manufactured by the Arcelis™ process in HIV patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). We conducted a sub study on circulating B cell populations to further assess changes induced by this autologous DC therapy as CD40L is a major B cell co-stimulatory factor. To this end, we assessed B cell subset changes in relation to the proliferative capacity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells response to DC targets containing the 4 HIV-1 antigens (Gag, Vpr, Rev, Nef). The co-expression of CD19, CD38, IgD, CD10, CD23, CD27, CD5, and CD138 were analyzed by multi-parametric flow cytometry to assess circulating B cell subsets such as naïve resting B-cells (Bm1), activated naïve B cells (Bm2), GC founder cells (Bm2’), centroblasts and centrocytes (Bm3 and Bm4), early memory B cells (eBm5), memory B cells (Bm5), IgD memory cells, plasma cells, and B-1 cells. Changes in B cells subsets were analyzed before and after the four intradermal injections of this immunotherapeutic product containing 1.2 × 107 DC. Ten ART treated subjects with undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/ml), median CD4+ count of 440 cells/μl (range: 316–1102), and with a CD4+ nadir > 200 cells/μl were studied. Throughout the study, no significant changes in CD4+ cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, and no viral blips were noticed. The percentage of total B cells, Bm1, Bm2, Bm2′, eBm5, IgD memory, plasma cells, and B-1 cell subsets did not significantly change. However, a decrease in the percentage of Bm3 and Bm4 cells was found (0.36 [0.06–0.86] versus 0.11 [0.04–0.36]; P=0.05). Conversely, an important increase in the Bm5 cell subset was evidenced (10.4 [1.6–24.2] versus 18.1 [5.1–27.5]; P=0.005) suggesting a proliferation of B memory cells induced by DC immunization. In addition, the multifunctional and polyvalent CD8+ T cell proliferative responses to the 4 HIV genes used in this immunotherapy were noticed in 8 out of 9 subjects available for analysis and characterized by an effector memory phenotype. No CD4+ T cell immune responses were detected, consistent with the endogenous HLA class I loading of the antigens. Collectively, these results indicate that this immunotherapy induces an increase in the B memory cell population in the absence of inducing any clinically apparent autoimmunity along with strong HIV specific multifunctional CD8+ T cell specific immune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".