Variation in fat globule size in bovine milk and its prediction using mid-infrared spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to investigate the sources of variation in milk fat globule (MFG) size in bovine milk and its prediction using mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy. Mean MFG size was measured in 2,076 milk samples from 399 Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Holstein, and Jersey cows, and expressed as volume moment mean (D[4,3]) and surface moment mean (D[3,2]). The mid-infrared spectra of the samples and milk performance data were also recorded during routine milk recording and testing. The effects of breed, herd nested within breed, days in milk, season, milking period, age at calving, parity, and individual animal on the variation observed in MFG size were investigated. Breed, herd nested within breed, days in milk, season, and milking period significantly affected mean MFG size. Milk fat globule size was the largest at the beginning of lactation and subsequently decreased. Milk samples with the smallest MFG on average came from Holstein cows, and those with the largest were from Jersey and Brown Swiss cows. Partial least squares regression was used to predict MFG size from MIR spectra of samples with a calibration data set containing 2,034 and 2,032 samples for D[4,3] and D[3,2], respectively. Coefficients of determination of cross validation for D[4,3] and D[3,2] prediction models were 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. The associated ratio of performance deviation values were 1.43 and 1.48 for D[4,3] and D[3,2], respectively. With these models, individual mean MFG size could not be accurately predicted, but results may be sufficient to screen samples for having either small or large MFG on average. Significant but low correlations of D[4,3] and D[3,2] with milk fat yield were estimated (0.16 and 0.21, respectively). Significant and moderate Pearson correlation coefficients for fat percent with D[4,3] and D[3,2] were assessed (0.34 and 0.36, respectively). This correlation was greater between milk fat percentage and predicted MFG size than with measured MFG size with coefficients of 0.47 and 0.49 for D[4,3] and D[3,2], respectively. The MIR prediction equations are potentially overusing the correlation between fat and MFG size and exploiting the strong relationship between the MIR spectra and total milk fat. However, the predictions of MFG size are able to determine variation in mean globule size beyond what would be achieved just by looking at the correlation with fat production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".