MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Report On Excessive Induction Toxicity in Infants with ALL Enrolled On COG Protocol AALL0631: A Children's Oncology Group Study.

2009· article· en· W2577722903 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick A. Brown, Joanne M. Hilden, ZoAnn E. Dreyer, Naomi Winick, Wanda L. Salzer, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Lillian Sung, Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Tamekia L. Jones, Meenakshi Devidas, Paola De Lorenzo, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Rob Pieters, William L. Carroll, Stephen P. Hunger

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInduction chemotherapyMucositisCohortInternal medicineChemotherapyCogPediatricsRandomizationAsparaginaseClinical trialSurgeryLeukemiaLymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3091 Poster Board III-28 Infants (age ≤ 1 year) with ALL are treated on separate protocols due to distinctive host characteristics and leukemia biology [frequent MLL rearrangements (MLL-r), high relapse rates]. AALL0631 is a treatment protocol for newly diagnosed infant ALL that stratifies patients by age at diagnosis and MLL status into three risk groups: high risk (HR) – age < 90 days, MLL- r; intermediate risk (IR) – age ≥ 90 days, MLL-r; standard risk (SR) – any age, MLL wild-type. All patients receive a common induction chemotherapy course. Post-induction chemotherapy is risk-stratified: SR patients receive relatively less intensive post-induction chemotherapy, and IR and HR patients receive more intensive post-induction chemotherapy and are eligible for randomization to also receive a FLT3 inhibitor (lestaurtinib). AALL0631 induction is based on the predecessor COG P9407 trial. In P9407, excessive induction toxicity was initially encountered, particularly among infants < 90 days of age, prompting changes to induction and prospective safety monitoring rules. A cohort of 142 eligible patients subsequently enrolled (cohort 3, or c3) did not trigger these stopping rules, and enrollment concluded on 10/20/2006. In AALL0631, two changes were made to induction compared to P9407c3: (1) daunomycin dose was reduced 15% to reduce the risk of mucositis; (2) E. coli asparaginase (8 doses over days 4 - 19) was replaced with PEG asparaginase (1 dose on day 4). Four of the first 26 patients enrolled on AALL0631 died of infections during induction, and one patient discontinued protocol therapy during induction due to severe non-fatal toxicity; all toxicities occurred prior to administration of lestaurtinib. This prompted suspension of the protocol on 11/19/2008, and a comprehensive review of induction toxicity for infants treated on AALL0631, P9407c3 and Interfant-99 (a published international cooperative group ALL study with 482 infants enrolled). Differences in Interfant-99 induction compared to COG AALL0631 include: 1) an initial 7 day prednisone-only “prophase” ; 2) 3- to 4-fold lower doses of daunorubicin; 3) use of low dose cytarabine; 4)no use of cyclophosphamide; 5) 2- to 3-fold lower doses of intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine, and 6) use of native as opposed to PEG L-asparaginase. The details of the 5 severe induction toxicities on AALL0631 are below (Table 1): TABLE 1 Age at dx (days) Type of toxicity Fatal? 1 Infection (fungal – Aspergillus fumigatus) Y 2 Severe hepatotoxicity/hyperbilirubinemia N 92 Infection (fungal – Candida tropicalis) Y 285 Infection (bacterial – Pseudomonas aeruginosa) Y 289 Infection (bacterial – Bacillus species) Y Non-fatal infections have also been prevalent. Table 2 summarizes the grade 3 or greater infectious adverse events (AE) that have been reported during induction therapy on AALL0631. TABLE 2 Organism Type AE Fatal AE % of AE # of Patients % of Patients Bacteria 19 2 76% 15 58% Blood 16 2 64% 13 50% Urine 3 0 12% 2 8% Fungi 4 2 16% 4 15% Viral 2 0 8% 2 8% Totals 25 4 100% 18* 69%* * these are not simple sums, since some patients had multiple AEs Of the 16 bacterial blood isolates, 12 (75%) were gram positive; of these, 6 (50%) were Viridans group streptococci. Since toxicities appeared to vary by age, we analyzed induction deaths by age group as shown in Table 3. Table 3 AALL0631 P9407c3 Both COG Interfant99 Age N Deaths Rate N Deaths Rate N Deaths Rate N Deaths Rate < =30 2 1 50% 6 1 17% 8 2 25% 30 3 10% 0-7 2 1 50% 2 1 50% 4 2 50% 9 2 22% 8-30 0 0 - 4 0 0% 4 0 0% 21 1 5% > 30 24 3 13% 136 5 4% 160 8 5% 452 19 4% ≥ 90 22 3 14% 115 4 4% 137 7 4% 370 nd - Infants ≤ 7 days old have a high risk of induction death with all regimens (overall 31%). For infants ≤ 30 days old, P9407c3 and AALL0631 have a higher induction death rate than Interfant-99 [OR 3.6 (0.5-27), p=.23] although the numbers are small. For infants > 30 days, AALL0631 has a higher induction death rate than P9407c3 [OR 3.7 (0.83-16.8), p=0.1] or Interfant-99 [OR 3.3 (0.89-11.9), p=0.09]. For infants ≥ 90 days, AALL0631 has a higher induction death rate than P9407c3 [OR 4.4 (0.9-21.1), p=0.08]. As a result of this analysis, we decided to make the following major changes to AALL0631: 1) adopt the Interfant-99 induction regimen for all age groups, but dose reduce an additional 25% for infants ≤ 7 days old; 2) enhance supportive care guidelines regarding infection prevention; 3) include a prospective induction death toxicity monitoring plan. Disclosures Zaoutis: Merck & Co.: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Enzon: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207