MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W257905389

How to Be an Intellectual in the Age of TV: The Lessons of Gore Vidal

2006· article· en· W257905389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dane S. Claussen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceScholarshipPoliticsCriticismMedia studiesSociologyPower (physics)HistoryArt historyLiteratureLawArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frank, Marcie. How to Be an in the Age of Lessons of Gore Vidal. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005.156 pp. $17.95. This book's tide suggests that the reader will learn something useful about how to be a public intellectual. That probably is not true, since the primary lesson is one that most people, let alone intellectuals and would-be intellectuals, already know. In any case, the lesson does not require an entire book. Marcie Frank, an English professor at Montreal's Concordia University and author of Gender, Theatre, and the Origins of Criticism (2002), concludes in a pseudo-theoretical way by crediting Gore Vidal's success at negotiating the print-screen circuit. Her refrain throughout the book, quoting a line merely attributed to him, is blunter and simpler: never pass up the opportunity to have sex or appear on television. book includes an introduction and five chapters: The Print Intellectual, The Screen Intellectual, A Fine Romance, Sexual Politics in the Print-Screen Circuit, and TV: Another Erogenous Zone. first chapter rushes superficially through recent scholarship on public intellectuals by Richard Posner, Edward Said, Neil Postman, and Michel Foucault (none of whom are/ were historians or traditional social scientists) before focusing on David Foster Wallace's article about the novel's decline and Vidal's position on that. The Screen Intellectual discusses some of Vidal's television appearances and the appearance of television in his books. A Fine Romance brings up romance in his books and how he transmit[s] his sexual politics on-screen (for example, he argues that there are homosexual acts but not homosexuals as persons). Sexual Politics in the Print-Screen Circuit goes further, discussing his homosexuality-themed novel, City and the Pillar, and his transgender/sexual books, Myra Breckinridge and Myron; William F. Buckley Jr. shouting queer at Vidal on national television in 1968; and more on his views on (homo) sex. final chapter dwells further on Myra and Myron plus his novel Live from Golgotha, in which television is used for travel to biblical times. Thus, ostensibly there is a lot more to this book than simply substantiating recommendations of sex and TV appearances, and the book can be short in part because it usually assumes readers' familiarity with the entire Vidal canon. But, simultaneously, Frank examines neither the minutiae of exactly how someone (especially anyone other than Vidal) should or could negotiate the print-screen circuit nor compares and contrasts his experiences with those of other writers who were on TV or could have been. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207