Immune and inflammatory gene expressions are different in Behçet’s disease compared to those in Familial Mediterranean Fever
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The immune classification of Behçet's disease (BD) is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to compare the immune/inflammatory gene expressions in BD with those in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), an autoinflammatory disorder with innate immune activation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CD4+ T cells and CD14+ monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Behçet's disease patients (n=10), FMF (n=6) patients, and healthy controls (n=4) with microbeads, and then, the mRNA was isolated. The expressions of 440 genes associated with immune and inflammatory responses were studied with a focused DNA microarray using a chemiluminescent tagging system. Changes above 1.5-fold and below 0.8-fold were accepted to be significant. RESULTS: In BD patients, in the CD4+ T-lymphocyte subset, interleukin 18 receptor accessory protein (1.7-fold), IL-7 receptor (1.9-fold), and prokineticin 2 (2.5-fold) were all increased compared to those in FMF patients, whereas chemokine (C-X3-C motif ) receptor-1 (CX3CR1) (0.7-fold) and endothelial cell growth factor-1 (0.6-fold) were decreased. In the CD14+ monocyte population, the V-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (1.5-fold), Interleukin-8 (IL-8) (2.1-fold), and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) (1.8-fold) were all increased, whereas the chemokine (C-C motif ) ligand 5 (CCL5) (0.6-fold), C-C chemokine receptor type 7 (0.6-fold), and CX3CR1 (0.7-fold) were decreased, again when compared to those in FMF. Compared to healthy controls in the CD4+ T-lymphocyte population, in both BD and FMF patients, pro-platelet basic protein and CD27 had elevated expression. In BD and FMF patients, 24 and 19 genes, respectively, were downregulated, with 15 overlapping genes between both disorders. In the CD14+ monocytes population, chemokine (C-C motif ) receptor-1 (CCR1) was upregulated both in BD and FMF patients compared to that in the controls, whereas CCL5 was downregulated. CONCLUSION: Immune and inflammatory gene expressions seem to be variable in both the innate (CD14+) and adaptive (CD4+) immune responses in BD and FMF patients compared to those in controls, suggesting differences in immune regulation between the two disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".