Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing of lecturer competency is one of the efforts made to increase the quality of the lecturers in Jabal Ghafur University of Sigli.The purpose of this study was to find out what the planning programs, the implementation, and the supervision of human resources improvement program.The source persons of this study were the rector, the vice deans, the lecturers from various study programs, the staffs of Research and Community Development Service, and the staffs of Quality Assurance Agency.This study was a qualitative descriptive study.The results of this study showed that the proses of planning programs of lecturer competency improvement included the teaching ability improvement, the research activity, the provision of journal publication media, the ease of access to the information needs of education, and the development of technology-based teaching.The implementation of the programs that has been carried out were the teaching ability improvement by developing and adopting new teaching methods, the research activity programs and its implementation through community service activity, and trainings, seminars, workshops, and short courses.The establishment of postgraduate dan doctorate degree program was also in process.The effort to establish cooperation with other more advanced universities has always been improved both for local and international level.The supervision system of the planning and the implementation of the programs was carried out by Rector and Quality Assurance Agency by monitoring and evaluating the lecturers performance at the end of each semester.The monitoring and evaluation report was given to the rector to be followed up.Rector was sending the report to each dean and head of study program at faculty level and instructed them to guide the lecturers who have good performance.While for those who have poor performance, the dean was asked to not giving them courses for the next semester, instructed the lecturers of foundation to be actively implementing research and community services as a requirement to get salary and send them to seminars and workshops activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".