Pseudomembranous Colitis Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Diarrhea is a well established cause of morbidity post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), occurring in 50–90% of patients - particularly in the first 20–30 days. Clostridium difficile toxin overproduction is a cause of diarrhea and can lead to serious morbidity and mortality. However, previous studies have demonstrated an incidence of C. difficile toxin positive diarrhea post ASCT of only 4%–7%. Our aims were to retrospectively identify the prevalence of C. difficile positive diarrhea in our population of ASCT patients in the first 30 days post transplant, and to retrospectively identify the prevalence of empiric antibiotic treatment for C. difficile diarrhea in these patients during the same time period. Methods: All patients who received ASCT or immediate post transplant care at the General Hospital, Health Sciences Centre between April 1996 and March 2004 were identified and the results of any stool cultures sent in the first 30 days post transplant were recorded. In addition, the use of metronidazole during the same time period in any patient with a stool culture sent was identified. Results: A total of 101 patients received ASCT or post transplant care between April 1996 and March 2004. Of these, 63 patients (62%) had a total of 75 stool cultures sent for culture and sensitivity as well as C. difficile toxin analysis. A total of 3 cultures from 2 patients (2%) were positive for C. difficile toxin. No other bacteria were isolated from stool samples. Of the 63 patients having C. difficile toxin analysis, 30 (48%) were treated with a course of metronidazole. Conclusions: Our population of ASCT patients have similar rates of C. difficile positive diarrhea as previously studied populations. Despite the very low frequency of C. difficile diarrhea in our patients, there was a high prevalence of empiric antibiotic treatment with metronidazole. Based on this data, we feel that it is safe to forego empiric antibiotic treatment pending stool culture results and to use anti-diarrheal agents to achieve symptomatic relief in patients with diarrhea immediately post ASCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".