Insecticides and Varietal Resistance in the Control of the Squash Vine Borer, Melittia Cucurbitae (Harr.), in Southwestern Ontario1
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In experiments on Golden Hubbard squash in 1952 and 1954, dusts of 2½ per cent aldrin, 1 and 2½ per cent dieldrin, 3 per cent methoxychlor, and 3 per cent aerosol-grade DDT each gave excellent control of the squash vine borer. A 1 per cent rotenone dust was moderately effective. Three applications, the first during the last week of June and the two others at 7- to 10-day intervals, were adequate The dusts should be directed to the bases of the stems, where 85 per cent of the eggs are laid The insecticides were not phytotoxic under conditions of the experiment Butternut pumpkin, Honey Cream watermelon, Iroquois muskmelon, Zucca melon, and red-seeded citron and National Pickling and Straight 8 cucumbers were immune to borer attack The following cucurbit varieties were susceptible in varying degrees: Delicata, Table Queen, Royal Acorn, Connecticut Field, and Small Sugar pumpkins, Vegetable Marrow (bush and trailing) summer squash; Mammoth Chili, Golden Delicious, Green Delicious, Blue Hubbard, Warted Hubbard...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it